In our ongoing search for meaning, the phrase “find your why” has become a global mantra.
We frequently look outward, to career coaches, self-help books, and cultural norms, hoping to uncover a ready made purpose.
Yet what if the deepest guidance is not found outside but built inside ourselves?
What if the strongest “answers within” come not from fleeting inspiration but from disciplined, serious reflection, a practice already anchored in ancient history?
French philosopher Michel Foucault, exploring the Greco-Roman notion of “care of the self” (epimeleia heautou), spotlighted a fascinating self-development practice and tool: the hypomnemata.
By exploring this ancient note-taking practice, we uncover a powerful, time-tested method for personal self-discovery that feels remarkably relevant to today's ongoing purpose-driven search.
So, what precisely were these hypomnemata?
At their simplest, they were personal notebooks, much like journals, widely employed by educated people throughout the classical Greek and Roman urban worlds. However, as Foucault carefully noted, they shared little with the later Christian confessional diary tradition designed to expose hidden, deeply personal sins or private feelings.
The hypomnemata served an entirely fundamentally different purpose.
As Foucault explains, their aim was “not to chase the unspeakable, nor reveal the hidden, nor utter the unspoken, but rather to seize what is already said, gathering whatever one has carefully heard or read for later use.”
These notebooks functioned as treasure chests of wisdom, philosophers' quotations, records of notable deeds, observations of the world, and reflections on one's own actions as well as readings. The aim was intensely practical: ethopoiesis, the deliberate shaping and construction of one's ethical self.
The hypomnemata became a core technology for “care of the self,” supporting a continual project of self-improvement and ethical living. The gathered material was never meant to sit inert on the page; it had to be reread, meditated on, and woven into one's being.
As Foucault, quoting Seneca, stresses, these thoughts “must become part of us: in short, the soul must fashion them not as its own but as itself.”
Writing, rereading, and reflecting formed the exercise itself, an ongoing process through which the writer deliberately constructed their own personal ethical framework.
The practice of hypomnemata was intertwined with the virtue of truthfulness, the need to be honest with oneself. Foucault linked these self-writing techniques to parrhesia, commonly translated as frank, fearless, open speech. Although parrhesia usually meant speaking truth to power or the public, within self-writing it concerns the crucial act of confronting yourself honestly, directly and personally through the written word.
The notebook became a space for candid self-assessment, a tool that held one accountable to the principles one collected and aspired to live by.
Within this private sphere, the writer became guarantor of their own truth, using the gathered wisdom as a benchmark for ongoing self-examination.
This practice was not isolated; it coexisted closely with other reflective writing forms, like the personal letters exchanged between philosophers such as Seneca and his friend Lucilius. These letters, much like the hypomnemata, acted as vehicles for self-scrutiny, sharing reflections on readings and offering guidance along the path of moral progress.
Seneca, for example, famously urged Lucilius to focus intently on a few valuable authors and, intriguingly, often quoted his philosophical rival Epicurus, encouraging his friend to extract truth wherever it might even appear.
This underscores a key principle inside these practices: the deliberate, active internalization of wisdom.
The aim was not merely to amass knowledge, but to make truth one's own through critical reflection and practice, echoing Seneca's maxim: “Whatever is true, is my own.”
How can this ancient discipline of curated self-reflection illuminate our modern struggle to “find your why”?
The method within the hypomnemata, patiently gathering resonant ideas, consistently rereading and meditating on them, consciously working to weave those insights into one's character, offers a powerful alternative to passively waiting for purpose to slowly yet surely appear.
It suggests that purpose is not discovered but forged.
This insight resonates strongly with core Stoic principles, teachings that influenced historical figures such as Seneca.
Stoicism consistently directs seekers inward, stressing that meaning arises from cultivating virtues, wisdom, justice, courage, temperance, grasping what lies within our control, namely our thoughts, judgments, intentions, and pursuing self-knowledge.
From this view, finding purpose is less about discovering a grand external mission and more about knowing your own character and aligning your actions with rationally chosen principles. The hypomnemata, therefore, can be viewed as a practical toolkit for this Stoic-inspired journey.
By intentionally collecting words and ideas that resonate with us, reflecting on our experiences, and examining our responses, we participate in the ongoing process of defining and refining the values that deeply shape our authentic “why.”
This internal exploration, this deliberate construction of the self, forms a stable foundation for purpose, producing genuine “answers within” that can guide us through life's inevitable changes.
In conclusion, our search for purpose, though distinctly modern in feeling, finds profound echoes within the ancient practices of self.
Michel Foucault's study of the hypomnemata uncovers more than simply historical curiosity; it reveals an enduring technique for ongoing self-cultivation.
These ancient notebooks remind us that knowing ourselves and discovering direction remains an active, continually evolving process.
The disciplined practice of collecting, reflecting on, and internalizing wisdom, seeking answers within through deliberate engagement with our thoughts and experiences, remains a potent, relevant path toward discovering a truly meaningful personal “why.”
Sources:
